How to choose between large and small AI models: A cost-benefit analysis

This blog post will guide you through the differences, use cases and cost-benefit analysis of different AI models, especially in the context of inference.

There’s a clear trend: bigger models generally perform better. Larger AI models, built with more data and parameters, demonstrate superior power, efficiency and accuracy compared to their smaller counterparts. However, this comes with a significant caveat: as models grow larger, they become increasingly resource-intensive. So must every team adopt these larger models? Or can organizations achieve their goals with smaller, more efficient alternatives?

This blog post will guide you through the differences, use cases and cost-benefit analysis of these models, especially in the context of machine learning inference. Additionally, you’ll discover how to utilize Nebius AI Studio to select the ideal model for your specific needs.

Some key terms associated with language models

A language model is a machine learning model trained on vast amounts of text data to understand, interpret and generate human-like text. These models use statistical and probabilistic methods to predict the likelihood of a sequence of words, enabling them to perform various tasks such as text completion, translation, summarization and even coding assistance.

Language models are the backbone of natural language processing, allowing machines to understand, generate and analyze human language. They are trained on vast datasets—think books, articles, websites and use learned patterns to predict or generate text that is both grammatically correct and semantically coherent.

  • Context length: The amount of text a model can consider when generating a response. Longer context lengths allow for more nuanced understanding and generation of text.

  • Tokens: The basic units of text that a model processes. Tokens can be words, subwords or characters, depending on the model’s architecture. For example, the word “unconditional” might be tokenized as [“un”, “condition”, “al”].

  • Parameters: The adjustable values within the model that are fine-tuned during training. The number of parameters often correlates with the model’s capacity to learn and generate complex outputs.

  • Fine-tuning: The process of adapting a pre-trained model to a specific task or domain by training it on a smaller, specialized dataset.

Types of language models

Statistical models

These models rely on statistical patterns to predict word likelihood. They use n-grams (sequences of 'n' words) to calculate probabilities, based on the Markov assumption that the chance of a word sequence depends only on the previous word.

Neural models

Neural language models use neural networks to predict word sequences. They can handle large vocabularies and deal with rare or unknown words through distributed representations. Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and transformer networks are common architectures here.

RNNs are adept at memorizing previous outputs for future predictions, while transformers analyze relationships in sequential data, like words in a sentence and can process entire sequences simultaneously, making them faster to train and use. Most of the modern LLMs use a transformer-based architecture.

Language models based on size

Large language models

LLMs are generally trained over massive amounts of textual data such as large collections of books and articles or even the entire internet. They use different types of transformers and neural network-based complex algorithms to learn the patterns and structure of the language, thus enabling them to generate coherent and meaningful responses on a wide range of topics.

These models are also generally called or known as generative AI models because they can generate text in a variety of different ways such as being able to predict the next word in a sentence or even completing a sentence or generating new text from scratch based on a given prompt.

As an example, some of the large language models include Claude, GPT-4 and GPT-3.5.

Small language models (SLMs)

SLMs have fewer parameters and are designed for more specific tasks. They’re efficient, cost-effective and ideal for applications with limited computational power. These are intentionally small in size. They are a type of language model which are designed to be able to run on local devices. They are lightweight and optimized for lower computational resources and thus they have limited memory which makes them suitable for deployment for applications that don’t require a lot of compute and they work well for low latency and even potentially offline processing as well.

Examples include BERT Mini or DISTILBERT, which excel in specialized tasks like sentiment analysis.

When to choose LLMs vs SLMs

LLMs

Advantages

  1. They provide versatility across a wide range of tasks

  2. LLMs generally have a higher capability to solve more complex and multi-step reasoning-based problems as they have more parameters enabling them to understand and generate more complex and contextually relevant information.

  3. They have a much broader context as they have been trained on vast amounts of diverse data, this makes them more suitable for tasks specifically requiring a deep understanding of language nuances.

  4. They have the potential to be fine-tuned for emergent capabilities not explicitly trained for.

Disadvantages

  1. LLMs have high computational requirements for training and inference.

  2. They have a longer inference time, which may impact real-time critical applications.

  3. Challenges in interpretability due to model complexity.

SLMs

Advantages

  1. Small language models require lesser compute and memory, thus making them faster to train, fine-tune and deploy. They are highly suitable for applications with limited resources or are constrained by time.

  2. Training and finetuning SLMs is generally less expensive in comparison to large language models as they require computation resources owing to having a smaller number of parameters.

  3. One can fine-tune small models for specific domain-related tasks resulting in better performance.

  4. SLMs are able to filter through a smaller subset of data, making them faster, more affordable and if you have your own data, far more customizable and even more accurate.

Disadvantages

  1. Small language models have limited versatility and need to be often specialized for specific tasks.

  2. These models may struggle with complex or nuanced tasks outside of their specific domain on which they have been trained.

  3. They do have a potential for lower latency compared to large models.

  4. They can be less adaptable to new tasks/problems without fine-tuning.

Choosing the right model for your organization’s needs

Let’s discuss how to choose the right kind of language model. Primarily it depends on the following factors:

  1. Defining your exact task requirement: Considering the complexity and the specific requirement of the task at hand, a small language model may suffice if the task is not that deep. But in case the task requires a much more deeper understanding and context for more complex tasks where you have multiple stakeholders or multiple steps involved, then a small language model is likely to fail. And that’s where a large language model with its broader understanding and context, because it has been trained over so much data, will be better to be able to handle such kind of complex tasks that require a deeper understanding and might have multiple steps involved in order to actually solve that particular task.

  2. Availability of the resources: We need to also assess the amount of compute, memory and the budgets involved. Normally, a small language model may be better if the resources are limited due to its efficiency and lower cost of running it because it has lower parameters. However, if budget and computing are not issues or constraints, then you can run large language models.

  3. Domain specificity: In case the task is highly domain-specific, then you could technically fine-tune a small language model for that particular domain, which could give you better results than a large language model. Now of course you can still fine-tune a large language model as well, but that would be more costly. So if you have smaller specific requirements in place, then a small language model might be better.

  4. Cost of Adoption: To calculate the cost of a language model’s adoption and usage at an organization, one should take into account primarily two different processes:

Fine-tuning: typically used as a preparatory step to enhance the model's capabilities because of its initial limited knowledge. The cost is determined by the size of the dataset that you're actually using for further training. So, simply put, the bigger the dataset, the higher will be that cost.

Inference: the operational process of applying the model in production and using it for your actual application. LLMs don't need fine-tuning unless you want the model to be able to distinguish the nuances of different medical jargon or be able to work on specific tasks. Small language models need fine-tuning for their initial capabilities as they lag behind the larger models.

It's also important to understand the concept of tokens as both fine-tuning and inference are basically charged based on them. Discussing the cost of inference brings us towards the input and output sequences and a model's user base. For instance, if you take GPT-4 as an LLM, it costs $0.03 per 1000 input tokens and $0.06 per 1k output tokens, resulting in a total of $0.09 per request. The substantial cost of LLM usage and the pursuit of being able to do that cost reduction have led to the smaller language models.

In case you have a specific type of task that does not require the complexity of a large language model and can be accomplished with a small model, then it will be much cheaper. For example, if you want to calculate the cost for a small language model like Mistral 7B, it will be $0.0001 per 1000 input tokens and $0.0003 per 1000 output tokens, resulting in $0.0004 per request.
  1. Environmental impact: Another important aspect to consider is the environmental impact. When running inference or training small language models, they consume less energy, resulting in a lower carbon footprint. However, training large language models requires more compute power, necessitating more GPUs, which leads to higher energy consumption and a larger carbon footprint. If your business prioritizes eco-friendly solutions and is willing to accept a trade-off for potentially lower quality or less proactive results compared to large language models, you may want to consider small language models.

  2. Deployment complexity: Additionally, deployment complexity is worth considering. Small language models are faster to deploy and integrate, especially for use cases involving edge devices or those with limited computational resources. In contrast, large language models are more challenging to deploy and maintain, requiring a higher level of expertise to manage effectively.

It’s essential to always evaluate the trade-offs between the model size, performance and resource requirements based on the current task at hand. If it’s a lot more complex task, then it’s better to use a large language model compared to a small language model.

Large language model real-life example

ChatGPT is being utilized by multiple organizations as an assistant to perform various kinds of tasks (asking complex questions, generating code, etc.). Being able to upload your documents like PDFs or Excel sheets and doing data analysis shows that it is a general model that can accomplish a number of different types of tasks and even more complex tasks because of its vast architecture.

An example of a small language model would be a customer chatbot for a highly specialized industry such as banking or insurance which can use a fine-tuned small language model with industry-specific data. This will allow the chatbot to understand and respond to customer queries within that specific domain.

Consideration of how a LLM solution scales in production

In order to shift from POCs to production, businesses also need to understand how scaling large language model-based applications impacts the cost-performance. It’s important not just to consider the model type and size but also the supporting infrastructure and the model serving capabilities.

In terms of the costs, with an understanding of the resourcing that’s required to actually develop and maintain a language model based solution, one should begin to estimate the end-to-end cost of different solutions. For example, when dealing with data that changes often, one should use a model that enhances its responses based on looking up the relevant information (using techniques like retrieval augmented generation). This approach comes with the added task of setting up and updating a search and retrieval system to find the right information, in addition to maintaining the main language model.

On the other hand, adapting a pre-trained or a fine-tuned model for a specific area involves initially gathering the right data for adjustments and training with this data to fine-tune the model. This upfront investment could pay off in the long run if one has a smaller, much more tailored small language model that can match the performance of a larger one, considering that it has been fine-tuned.

What is Nebius AI Studio?

Nebius AI Studio is a newly launched platform by Nebius AI that has been designed to simplify and streamline AI integrations.

  • It offers high-performance, cost-effective access to state-of-the-art open-source AI models like Llama and Mistral, with a user-friendly interface for experimentation and deployment.

  • The platform features a flexible dual-flavor approach for optimizing speed and cost, an intuitive Playground for model testing and an OpenAI-compatible API for easy integration.

  • Nebius AI Studio aims to democratize advanced AI capabilities by providing a scalable solution that’s up to 4.5x faster and 50% cheaper than leading competitors, making cutting-edge AI technologies accessible to organizations of all sizes.

  • The rich model selection allows you to experiment with both small and large language models and choose which model is best for your use case.

How to experiment with different SLMs and LLMs on Nebius AI Studio

Nebius AI provides a wide selection open open-source small language models like Phi-3 mini and large language models like Llama 3.1 and Mistral.

Navigate to Nebius AI Studio.

  1. You will be able to see the list of all the available models in the catalog. You will find useful information such as the context length of the model and the pricing for the model. Choose the model you wish to wish to experiment with and click on Go to Playground to experiment with the model.
  1. Once you open the playground, you can set the different model parameters like the temperature and maximum tokens. Add a system prompt if required and then send a message as a prompt to the model. You will see the response generated in the chat section.
  1. You can compare the response generated for the given prompt between different models using the Compare button. This opens the comparison page where you select different models and compare their response. This is really helpful for you to select the model of your choice. So, depending on your use case, you can select which model will best fit your workflow.
  1. You also use the models and parameters for a given model inside code with support for Python, cURL or JavaScript code snippets available to you to use the model inside an actual application.

Thus with Nebius AI Studio, you can test responses from different language models and provide a really seamless way to select the model of your choice. Considering the factors for choosing whether you wish to proceed with small or large language models you can pick and choose based on specific workflows.

Conclusion

Choosing between large language models and small language models is a crucial decision for organizations that depends on various factors such as task complexity, available resources, domain specificity and most importantly cost considerations.

While the large and small LLMs do offer versatility and a deep understanding across a wide multitude of tasks, small language models are more suitable for specific domains and tasks where the cost of a large language model is not justified. Small language models are more efficient and cost-effective and provide faster deployment for specific applications.

Organizations must carefully evaluate their needs, weighing the trade-off between the model size, performance and resource requirements. Nebius AI Studio emerges as a valuable platform in this landscape, offering a user-friendly environment to experiment with both small and large language models. Its features like having a very large model catalog, playground and comparison tools empower individuals to make more informed decisions about which particular model will suit their specific use case.

By providing access to the state-of-the-art open-source models, Nebius AI Studio is democratizing advanced AI capabilities. Ultimately, the right choice between SLMs and LLMs facilitated by platforms like Studio can lead to more efficient, cost-effective and tailored AI solutions.

Explore Nebius AI Studio

Explore Nebius

author
Nebius team
Sign in to save this post